Discussion on the theoretical basis of superluminal phenomena. Fluid dynamics in the warp drive spacetime geometry. Curvature invariants for the Alcubierre and Natario warp drives. Dust contents solutions for the Alcubierre warp drive spacetime, Europ. Effects of external radiation on an Alcubierre warp bubble. Fundamental limitations on warp drive spacetimes. A warp drive with more reasonable total energy. Restrictions on negative energy density in flat spacetime. On the attraction between two perfect conducting plates. Beitrage zur Einsteinschen gravitations theorie. Science and Technology Daily February, 2022.įlamm L. Finding warp bubbles in the real world? Don't worry. Journal of Communication University of China (Natural Science). The study and discussion of general relativity. Is Einstein's special theory of relativity correct? Journal of Communication University of China (Natural Science). The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity.
Negative energy, wormhole and warp drive. Wormholes, time machines and the weak energy condition. Klasse f'ur Mathematik, Physik und Technik. Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
In this article, the Warp drive solution may be just a joke.Įinstein A. In this regard, a comparison between the first half and the second half of the article will make it clear that the former pay attention to mathematical analysis The latter believe that mathematical analysis is necessary, but more attention should be paid to the study of physical reality. In addition, this paper points out that theoretical physicists and aviation and aerospace experts think differently about the same superluminal space travel problem. However, several possible ways of generating negative energy are also provided for discussion.īy contrast, electromagnetic propulsion(EM drive), which is feasible for faster than light travel, is presented in this paper. Dirac, is only a means or tool of analysis and does not necessarily exist in fact. Regarding negative energy and special matter, we believe that the concept of negative energy, first proposed by P. Existing high energy particle accelerators could be modified to look for faster than light particles, and so on. For example, we can learn from the experience of breaking sonic barrier in aviation engineering to achieve supersonic flight. Therefore, we should still pay attention to basic research. Wormhole or Warp drive propulsion require extreme spacetime bending and great negative energy, which are not achievable. Therefore, the spacetime bending of GR is not a reassuringly reliable theory. That is, physics experiments have never provided the knowledge and laws that show the geometry of gravity that only Riemann geometry can show. However, in the absence of actual observational knowledge, EGFE is derived by speculative reasoning. The physical effect of the gravitational field is determined to be embodied by the metric tensor of Riemann space, and it is necessary to know the distribution law of the metric field.
How to get to "gravity bends spacetime"(or "spacetime bending makes gravity") is a fundamental question. Einstein's equation of gravitational field (EGFE) is the most important formula in GR, but EGFE has obvious assumptions and traces of patchwork. We think that the idea of relying on GR to achieve faster than light travel is not desirable, because as a theoretical system, GR's internal logic is chaotic and causality is reversed. Because SR's "ban" on faster than light motion is wrong. This article argues that this should not and need not be done. Many physicists have repeatedly turned to general relativity(GR) for the feasibility of faster than light astronautic travel, bypassing the difficulties caused by special relativity (SR).